Improved survival rate after cryopreservation of human fresh and aged unfertilized oocytes using a specially developed oocyte cryopreservation regime.

DS Yang, KL Winslow and PL Blohm. Florida Institute for Reproductive Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida.


Objectives: Most reported oocyte cryopreservation regimes using 1,2-propanediol (PROH) and sucrose are identical or very similar to the embryo cryopreservation protocols (protocol E) used in human assisted reproduction laboratories. The oocytes cryopreserved with these protocols often have poor survival after thawing. Lack of sufficient shrinkage when metaphase II (MII) oocytes exposed to embryo freezing solution containing 1.5M PROH for equilibrium was observed during our initial experiment with cryopreservation of unfertilized oocytes. Based on the physiology of oocyte and its response to freezing/thawing solutions a special oocyte cryopreservation regime (protocol O) was developed in our lab. This study compares the survival of cryopreserved human oocytes using protocol E and protocol O.

Design: Prospective comparative study.

Materials and Method: A total of 111 MII oocytes were used in this study. These include: 1) 15 MII oocytes developed from germinal vesicle (GV) and metaphase I (MI) stage in vitro 24/48 hours after oocyte retrieval (group A); 2) 81 unfertilized oocytes 24/48 hours after insemination (group B); 3) 15 fresh oocytes from 3 oocytes donation cycles (group C). Only MII unfertilized cumulus free oocytes were used in this study. With protocol E, 53 oocytes (8, 39 and 6 from group A, B and C, respectively) were pre-equilibrated in 1.5M PROH, and 1.5M PROH containing 0.1M sucrose for 5 minutes each at 220C before loaded in straws. Fifty-eight oocytes (7, 42 and 9 from group A, B and C, respectively) were pre-equilibrated in 1.5M PROH, and 1.5M PROH containing 0.2M sucrose for 5 minutes each at 370C with protocol O. Controlled cooling rate to -70C was at -20C/minute and -30C /minute with protocol E and protocol O respectively before seeding and further cooling. During equilibrium with 1.5M PROH oocytes were observed for morphology change. After thawing, cryoprotectants were removed by stepwise dilution. Oocytes survived the freezing/thawing procedures were cultured in HTF with 10% serum for 2 hours to further assess their viability. Fisher's exact test was applied to analyze the results.

Results: Significant oocyte shrinkage was observed on the oocytes equilibrated in 1.5M PROH at 370C. Eighteen of the oocytes (34%, 18/53) cryopreserved in protocol E survived freezing/thawing and 2 hour culture (2, 15 and 1 oocyte from group A, B and C, respectively). The survival rate of the oocytes cryopreserved in protocol O was significantly better than in protocol E (P<0.001). Forty-one oocytes (71%, 41/58) in protocol O survived freezing/thawing and 2 hour culture (5, 30 and 6 oocytes from group A, B and C, respectively).

Conclusions: The oocyte cryopreservation regime (protocol O) used in this study achieved superior cryosurvival rate after freezing/thawing of human mature oocytes. Equilibrium at 370C improves water and PROH permeability of the cytoplasm membrane of unfertilized oocytes. Increased concentration of sucrose in freezing solution, through removal of more intracytoplasmic water, further reduces ice formation in oocytes. More rapid cooling to subzero temperature may minimize oocyte toxicity of the cryoprotectants. Further clinical study is needed on the fertilization and implantation of cryopreserved fresh human oocyte after thawing.